<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post8590002907748866689..comments</id><updated>2009-01-27T11:42:40.556-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on DoubleSqueeze: A few bidding problems</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/feeds/8590002907748866689/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html'/><author><name>McKenzie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06326701257198329705</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-5125839121597712138</id><published>2009-01-27T11:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-27T11:42:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A) (yes, i open 1C) 4D and reluctantly accepting a...</title><content type='html'>A) (yes, i open 1C) 4D and reluctantly accepting a 4H signoff, since further cuebids could get us too high opposite the wrong hand. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;B) 3S on values and since i intend to bid it over the sure balance that's brewing on my left&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;C1) yes.&lt;BR/&gt;C2) assuming i opened 1S, double.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;D) double and converting 3C to 3D.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;E) S6.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/5125839121597712138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/5125839121597712138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html?showComment=1233074520000#c5125839121597712138' title=''/><author><name>lance</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02168891378821653361</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-8590002907748866689' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/posts/default/8590002907748866689' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-9150121368611240581</id><published>2009-01-10T00:21:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-10T00:21:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>(A) 4d, would be nice to be playing that 3d shows ...</title><content type='html'>(A) 4d, would be nice to be playing that 3d shows an invitational or very strong splinter so that this isn't the strongest bid available&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(B) 3h, worth a limit raise&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(C1) pass&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(C2) pass&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(D) Dbl, converting 3c to 3d doesnt show extras&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(E) spade</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/9150121368611240581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/9150121368611240581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html?showComment=1231564860000#c9150121368611240581' title=''/><author><name>Noble Shore</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00691028998631642429</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-8590002907748866689' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/posts/default/8590002907748866689' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-4566508242316271533</id><published>2009-01-09T23:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-09T23:06:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A-i kind of like a 1 heart opening as well, but ca...</title><content type='html'>A-i kind of like a 1 heart opening as well, but can't argue too much with 1 club considering.  problem is that now we have to overstate our hand in some way since we can't stop short of game.  i guess i like 4 clubs best...lying about strength again, but extra distribution.&lt;BR/&gt;B-ya, i like 3 hearts also...even slam is possible if lho has a bad heart raise and opener is weak...all partner needs is Axxxx x KQTx Axx.  if partner bids 3 spades...i guess it's a style question but at these colors i'd guess to bid game with any of my regular partners.&lt;BR/&gt;C-would open 1 spade if in the mood...would double 2 clubs, especially if i had opened 1 spade.&lt;BR/&gt;D-i think i'd let them play though that may sound pretty wimpy.&lt;BR/&gt;E-i like the 9 of clubs at any form of the game partly because partner had a chance to overcall a spade.  especially at matchpoints i'm nervous about any other lead costing us a trick.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/4566508242316271533'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/4566508242316271533'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html?showComment=1231560360000#c4566508242316271533' title=''/><author><name>Becker</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13964251260317901284</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-8590002907748866689' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/posts/default/8590002907748866689' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-8497356840971540524</id><published>2009-01-08T21:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-08T21:31:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>(A) In our system, I open 1H.  The hand has the pl...</title><content type='html'>(A) In our system, I open 1H.  The hand has the playing strength of a strong club opener... but only if we have a fit.  So 1H it is, but I encourage strongly to game/slam over partner's support.  Playing regular 2/1, 1C is my bid, and in this auction, I like a 4D splinter over 1H.  It's just 10 HCP, but it's also just 4 losers.  Definitely a game force when we have a fit, and I'm certainly interested in slam.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(B)  Partner's not coming in without something interesting at these colors.  I think an encouraging 3H is right, but I am a little concerned about duplicated values and lots of heart losers.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(C1) If I am bidding here, it's 2C, but I don't like that option.  I'm sitting this one out.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(C2) I think a lead-directing double is in order here.  I definitely want pard to lead a black suit, and I fear there's a better than 50% chance he'll lead a red suit if I don't suggest otherwise.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(D) Double.  Pulling 3C to 3D.  Pretty sure this doesn't show anything more than I've got.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;(E) Spade 6 seems like the least unappealing of 13 unappealing choices.  Playing attitude leads, pard won't necessarily expect length here, so I don't expect to block the suit.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/8497356840971540524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/8590002907748866689/comments/default/8497356840971540524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html?showComment=1231468260000#c8497356840971540524' title=''/><author><name>Meg</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18023166613491155634</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='14886575489061978205'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.doublesqueeze.com/2009/01/few-bidding-problems.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8314337641002386924.post-8590002907748866689' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8314337641002386924/posts/default/8590002907748866689' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>